A motion to bifurcate a proceeding into bid protest and contract phases was denied in part and granted in part by the Court of Federal Claims because there were common elements regarding the government's liability for both the bid protest and breach of contract claim, but the common elements did not extend to determining damages. The "unusual" case combining a bid protest and a Contract Disputes Act claim arose when the government unilaterally amended a contract to administer a conservation trust. The contractor alleged the amendment, which established a contractual termination date, and the government's subsequent solicitation for a replacement trustee breached the trust agreement. The contractor's protest sought injunctive and declaratory relief, and its CDA claim sought breach damages. The government moved to bifurcate the proceedings to resolve the bid protest before addressing the merits of the contract claim.